1 00:00:01,660 --> 00:00:13,350 [Music] 2 00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:15,810 [Applause] 3 00:00:15,810 --> 00:00:18,800 [Music] 4 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:20,160 ladies and gentlemen 5 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:22,160 please welcome the moderator of the one 6 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:24,160 of the last sessions at the habsburg 7 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:25,039 stage 8 00:00:25,039 --> 00:00:31,599 steve clemons 9 00:00:31,599 --> 00:00:33,200 hey everyone i'm steve clemons it's a 10 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:34,960 pleasure to be with you i'm editor 11 00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:37,440 at large of the hill in washington d.c 12 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:38,960 uh i see we've got a couple of our 13 00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:41,040 panelists online it's great to see you 14 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:43,120 uh and we've got people here who i think 15 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:45,280 you must be the most obsessed people at 16 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:46,160 globesec 17 00:00:46,160 --> 00:00:48,879 with carbon taxes so great to have you 18 00:00:48,879 --> 00:00:49,840 here 19 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:51,039 let me tell you what we're going to be 20 00:00:51,039 --> 00:00:52,079 discussing we're going to be talking 21 00:00:52,079 --> 00:00:54,399 about eu climate diplomacy leadership 22 00:00:54,399 --> 00:00:57,280 and the carbon border tax we may 23 00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:58,640 actually broaden this a little up 24 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:00,239 because we've got glasgow coming up in 25 00:01:00,239 --> 00:01:01,199 new november 26 00:01:01,199 --> 00:01:03,199 uh there's a lot going on both in the 27 00:01:03,199 --> 00:01:04,959 transatlantic relationship 28 00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:07,439 uh but but globally within this realm 29 00:01:07,439 --> 00:01:08,720 and the topic that we're going to be 30 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:10,159 discussing today and we have people who 31 00:01:10,159 --> 00:01:12,000 understand the technical dimensions but 32 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:14,320 they also are able to lift up to the big 33 00:01:14,320 --> 00:01:16,720 political and geopolitical dimensions of 34 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:17,600 this um 35 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:19,040 and we have three wonderful things with 36 00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:21,040 me on stage here in person 37 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:23,600 it's my first in-person first interview 38 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:24,960 here at globe cycle all my others have 39 00:01:24,960 --> 00:01:26,400 been online but 40 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:28,960 great to have with me uh here christian 41 00:01:28,960 --> 00:01:30,560 engenhofer is the senior research 42 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:31,280 associate 43 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:32,799 at the school of transnational 44 00:01:32,799 --> 00:01:34,400 governments at european university 45 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:35,439 institute in florence 46 00:01:35,439 --> 00:01:37,280 and he's also associate senior research 47 00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:38,640 fellow at sepps in brussels 48 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:40,159 so great to have christian with me but 49 00:01:40,159 --> 00:01:41,840 jennifer hillman my colleague and friend 50 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:43,200 from washington d.c 51 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:44,960 we were online together just the other 52 00:01:44,960 --> 00:01:46,720 day for the calorama conversation 53 00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:48,640 where we discussed exactly this topic 54 00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:50,399 with pascal amy the former director 55 00:01:50,399 --> 00:01:51,439 general of the 56 00:01:51,439 --> 00:01:53,439 world trade organization and senator 57 00:01:53,439 --> 00:01:55,600 sheldon whitehouse and jennifer pones 58 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:56,960 from the jacques de lore institute and 59 00:01:56,960 --> 00:01:59,439 jennifer we didn't get to talk that day 60 00:01:59,439 --> 00:02:01,360 but i actually called when we were when 61 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:02,719 we were online i said 62 00:02:02,719 --> 00:02:04,560 jennifer hillman will know the answer to 63 00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:05,840 this question and then you had already 64 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:07,520 slipped off but it's great to have you 65 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:09,119 uh here with us and then of course we 66 00:02:09,119 --> 00:02:11,599 have pascal uh uh 67 00:02:11,599 --> 00:02:14,000 uh pascal confines chair of the 68 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:15,920 committee on environment public health 69 00:02:15,920 --> 00:02:17,440 and food safety 70 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,120 in the european parliament he's just 71 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:20,640 finished a meeting pascal thank you so 72 00:02:20,640 --> 00:02:21,920 much for running out of that meeting to 73 00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:22,720 join us here 74 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:24,800 and help us set the stage uh on this 75 00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:26,080 topic what i'd 76 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:27,760 just like to say for a moment and and 77 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:29,120 this doesn't have to be where the 78 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:30,480 conversation goes 79 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:32,080 each of you can ask questions here in 80 00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:33,840 the room those of you who have the globe 81 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:34,640 sec app 82 00:02:34,640 --> 00:02:37,360 can ask questions online and they will 83 00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:38,959 be fed to me up here and i hope you will 84 00:02:38,959 --> 00:02:40,160 do that i know we have 85 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:42,400 uh some viewers on zoom as well but let 86 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:43,920 me just you know say at the beginning 87 00:02:43,920 --> 00:02:45,200 that the reason 88 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,040 that i had the opportunity to help 89 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:48,400 moderate a discussion 90 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:50,239 previously with people who are real 91 00:02:50,239 --> 00:02:51,840 experts in this topic i should say i'm 92 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:52,319 not 93 00:02:52,319 --> 00:02:54,480 i can ask the lay question and the silly 94 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,239 question hopefully some informed 95 00:02:56,239 --> 00:02:56,800 questions 96 00:02:56,800 --> 00:02:58,239 but when we had jennifer hillman and 97 00:02:58,239 --> 00:02:59,360 many other colleagues in the 98 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:01,519 transatlantic relationship online 99 00:03:01,519 --> 00:03:04,319 a couple of weeks ago discussing uh the 100 00:03:04,319 --> 00:03:05,040 the 101 00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:07,680 uh carbon border tax with regard to this 102 00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:09,440 there is a concern i'm just going to put 103 00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:10,319 on the table 104 00:03:10,319 --> 00:03:12,959 that europe is evolving in one direction 105 00:03:12,959 --> 00:03:14,239 and the united states and other 106 00:03:14,239 --> 00:03:15,760 countries is evolving in another 107 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:16,560 direction 108 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:18,480 and that the lack of coordination the 109 00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:19,920 lack of alignment 110 00:03:19,920 --> 00:03:22,080 even though they most may have carbon 111 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:24,400 goals creates real complexities and 112 00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:26,239 problems in transnational firms and 113 00:03:26,239 --> 00:03:27,599 companies and regions 114 00:03:27,599 --> 00:03:28,959 and so i wanted to say just on the 115 00:03:28,959 --> 00:03:30,799 outset that that's one of my real 116 00:03:30,799 --> 00:03:31,519 interests 117 00:03:31,519 --> 00:03:33,680 is it's something i hadn't considered 118 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:35,760 but as we talk about greater goals and 119 00:03:35,760 --> 00:03:36,799 carbon goals 120 00:03:36,799 --> 00:03:39,840 as we get to glasgow in november that 121 00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:41,599 this lack of alignment was something at 122 00:03:41,599 --> 00:03:43,440 least pascal lamy underlined 123 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:45,519 as a serious concern from his 124 00:03:45,519 --> 00:03:46,560 perspective so 125 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:49,040 let me ask uh another pascal of course 126 00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:50,239 chairman pascal 127 00:03:50,239 --> 00:03:53,680 uh uh uh convene to to join and and help 128 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:54,799 set the stage 129 00:03:54,799 --> 00:03:56,480 for what you see is the dashboard of 130 00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:58,319 concern as you look at uh 131 00:03:58,319 --> 00:04:00,799 adjustable carbon taxes border taxes uh 132 00:04:00,799 --> 00:04:01,599 in this realm 133 00:04:01,599 --> 00:04:04,720 pascal yeah so uh 134 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,200 thank you for giving me the opportunity 135 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:07,760 to 136 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:11,040 to share uh our thinking uh in europe 137 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:15,360 about it so uh first 138 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:18,880 it will not be a tax it will be 139 00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:22,639 uh the mirror of the european trading 140 00:04:22,639 --> 00:04:23,600 scheme 141 00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:27,120 so if the european carbon price is of 142 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:30,240 52 one day 143 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:32,960 the eta the the the carbon border 144 00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:33,680 adjustment 145 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:36,960 will be 52 the very same day 146 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,600 if it's 40 carbon border adjustment will 147 00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:40,400 be 40 148 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:43,680 okay it will be mirroring the price 149 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,199 paid in the eu second 150 00:04:47,199 --> 00:04:51,199 it will be the exact mirror on the 151 00:04:51,199 --> 00:04:54,320 volume as well meaning that if 152 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:58,400 part of the carbon is not paid by 153 00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:01,360 european industry because they still 154 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:02,479 receive 155 00:05:02,479 --> 00:05:04,400 free allocations for part of their 156 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:06,240 emission then of course 157 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,520 we will apply the very same scope for 158 00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:12,560 imports that give you 159 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:15,680 uh two examples of the way we want to 160 00:05:15,680 --> 00:05:16,720 design 161 00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:18,800 the carbon border adjustment mechanism 162 00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:20,960 that will be legally presented 163 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:24,080 formally by the european commission the 164 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:26,320 14th of july so in 165 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:30,000 exactly one month's time we want to have 166 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:30,320 it 167 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:33,759 wto compatible that's a red line we do 168 00:05:33,759 --> 00:05:36,240 not want to enter into a trade war on 169 00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:38,000 climate with our partners 170 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:41,039 it's a no-go for us but the other no 171 00:05:41,039 --> 00:05:41,680 goal 172 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:45,120 for us is that we would have a price of 173 00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:46,000 carbon 174 00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:50,400 with of 50 60 maybe 70 to 80 175 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:55,360 we are as already more than 50 today 176 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:58,800 that will be applied to our industries 177 00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:02,720 and then importers will play zero 178 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:05,039 zero on carbon and then that would just 179 00:06:05,039 --> 00:06:06,880 put out of the market 180 00:06:06,880 --> 00:06:10,639 our own industry so it's politically 181 00:06:10,639 --> 00:06:13,440 unacceptable uh for jobs reason and 182 00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:14,160 acceptable 183 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:16,240 and for climate reason that would be 184 00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:18,160 completely counterproductive and if 185 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:19,919 ineffective because that would mean that 186 00:06:19,919 --> 00:06:21,759 that would be a huge incentive 187 00:06:21,759 --> 00:06:25,840 for not going green so that's why 188 00:06:25,840 --> 00:06:29,520 we need as we enter into a new era 189 00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:32,240 of carbon pricing in europe in the past 190 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:33,520 the carbon price was 191 00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:36,160 let's say 10 15 20 euros bottle you do 192 00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:38,080 not change anything with this 193 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:41,280 now we are at 50 we will probably very 194 00:06:41,280 --> 00:06:42,000 soon 195 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:45,680 go up to 60 and later on to 80. 196 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:48,000 at that level of price for some 197 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:49,520 industries 198 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:52,880 you cannot uh stay on the market 199 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:55,039 with competitors paying zero right so 200 00:06:55,039 --> 00:06:56,880 that's the basic equation 201 00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:00,080 so i put there all the key elements that 202 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:01,039 will drive 203 00:07:01,039 --> 00:07:04,319 our proposal that will be made 204 00:07:04,319 --> 00:07:06,479 in the couple of weeks time and again in 205 00:07:06,479 --> 00:07:09,039 a very cooperative way with our partners 206 00:07:09,039 --> 00:07:10,560 we do not want to 207 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:12,880 be in a trade war we do want to be 208 00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:14,960 within the space of wto 209 00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:17,440 if it is within the space of the wto and 210 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:19,280 we know how to do it 211 00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:21,360 then it is within the rules we all 212 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:22,479 agreed 213 00:07:22,479 --> 00:07:26,000 so that's why uh i don't think it's a 214 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:27,919 i don't think the the carbon border just 215 00:07:27,919 --> 00:07:30,479 mechanism as a non-comparative mechanism 216 00:07:30,479 --> 00:07:32,720 but just as an equitable mechanism to 217 00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:34,240 make sure that we can move forward the 218 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:35,280 climate agenda 219 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,759 without jeopardizing our industrial 220 00:07:37,759 --> 00:07:40,240 competitiveness 221 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:43,280 we have uh uh jennifer hillman as i 222 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:44,240 mentioned the council on foreign 223 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:45,199 relations we've got chris you're going 224 00:07:45,199 --> 00:07:46,720 to come in but i want to ask you one 225 00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:49,039 question pascal before we move to 226 00:07:49,039 --> 00:07:50,000 jennifer 227 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:53,120 is is the question of you're not a 228 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,280 bureaucrat you're a politician you chair 229 00:07:55,280 --> 00:07:56,160 a committee 230 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:57,759 you i'm just interested you know just 231 00:07:57,759 --> 00:08:00,720 given my own washington orientation 232 00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:02,639 is there kind of a strong robust 233 00:08:02,639 --> 00:08:04,879 consensus on your committee that this is 234 00:08:04,879 --> 00:08:06,879 you know all packed up and ready to go 235 00:08:06,879 --> 00:08:09,440 or are there any elements of controversy 236 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:12,000 and and you know difference of opinion 237 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:13,120 as you see it 238 00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:14,560 in this area what are the political 239 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:16,800 fault lines that you deal with 240 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:19,919 now there is a wide majority a very wide 241 00:08:19,919 --> 00:08:21,599 majority behind what i see 242 00:08:21,599 --> 00:08:23,680 behind what i supporting what i said 243 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:24,720 meaning 244 00:08:24,720 --> 00:08:28,080 it has to be fair equitable wto 245 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:29,280 compatible 246 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:33,760 and if i take the u.s specific case 247 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,719 if there is no carbon price in the u.s 248 00:08:36,719 --> 00:08:39,360 for domestic reasons 249 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:43,679 then we have to make sure as europeans 250 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:46,800 that we take the implicit price of 251 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:48,000 carbon carbon 252 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:50,560 so the explicit price on carbon is 253 00:08:50,560 --> 00:08:53,279 either through markets or through taxes 254 00:08:53,279 --> 00:08:55,680 but you can have implicit price on 255 00:08:55,680 --> 00:08:57,200 carbon through standards 256 00:08:57,200 --> 00:08:59,040 if you put a standard on cars or 257 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:00,959 standard or aluminium and so on you have 258 00:09:00,959 --> 00:09:02,560 an implicit price on 259 00:09:02,560 --> 00:09:05,600 on carbon and then it would be 260 00:09:05,600 --> 00:09:09,440 fair to have that in the design 261 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:10,800 of the carbon border adjustment 262 00:09:10,800 --> 00:09:12,959 mechanism so that if the us 263 00:09:12,959 --> 00:09:16,320 put a standard on a certain sector 264 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,440 a certain commodity 265 00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:22,880 without putting a price we translate 266 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:25,120 the standard into the equivalent of a 267 00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:26,000 price 268 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:29,279 so that we do not double 269 00:09:29,279 --> 00:09:32,480 price the carbon from the u.s because 270 00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:33,680 that would be unfair 271 00:09:33,680 --> 00:09:37,279 from us to you so that's why when i say 272 00:09:37,279 --> 00:09:38,240 all of that 273 00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:41,360 be behind this you have a very very 274 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:42,720 strong majority 275 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:45,519 uh across the board to support this idea 276 00:09:45,519 --> 00:09:46,240 well thank you 277 00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:47,680 well let me bring in jennifer hillman 278 00:09:47,680 --> 00:09:49,680 and jennifer hillman is the senior 279 00:09:49,680 --> 00:09:51,760 uh fellow for trade and international 280 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:53,040 political economies i said at the 281 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:54,240 council on foreign relations 282 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:56,080 but more importantly she has been a 283 00:09:56,080 --> 00:09:58,000 trade official of the united states 284 00:09:58,000 --> 00:09:59,680 the international trade commission the 285 00:09:59,680 --> 00:10:01,440 u.s trade representative office 286 00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:03,360 in the worked in the wto jennifer 287 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:04,959 probably knows more about trade 288 00:10:04,959 --> 00:10:06,800 uh than anyone else at globe sec i think 289 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:08,399 but on this cut area but when it comes 290 00:10:08,399 --> 00:10:10,160 to these alignment areas 291 00:10:10,160 --> 00:10:12,480 uh jennifer about you know what we just 292 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:14,880 heard from pascal on this subject today 293 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:17,360 do you share what pascal amy put on the 294 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:18,000 table that 295 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:20,079 he he worries that there's a lack of 296 00:10:20,079 --> 00:10:21,600 alignment geopolitically 297 00:10:21,600 --> 00:10:23,920 and since you have a foot on so many 298 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:25,120 different dimensions 299 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:27,040 of this question and you just heard uh 300 00:10:27,040 --> 00:10:29,040 pascal's comment on on what we need to 301 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:29,839 do 302 00:10:29,839 --> 00:10:31,680 um i'd love to get your sense of whether 303 00:10:31,680 --> 00:10:33,839 united states is anywhere near 304 00:10:33,839 --> 00:10:35,360 that level of sophistication and 305 00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:37,120 approaching you know uh 306 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:40,640 a price on carbon well first of all 307 00:10:40,640 --> 00:10:42,320 thank you very much it's an honor to be 308 00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:43,760 here and i will say i 309 00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:46,399 i share if you will both pascal's views 310 00:10:46,399 --> 00:10:48,079 i mean on the one hand i agree with 311 00:10:48,079 --> 00:10:50,160 pascal amy that there is 312 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:52,720 a high risk uh that what the european 313 00:10:52,720 --> 00:10:54,000 union is doing could 314 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,320 create tensions uh with the united 315 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:58,240 states and with others and i would say 316 00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:00,399 maybe even more particularly with 317 00:11:00,399 --> 00:11:02,000 developing countries who are going to 318 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:03,760 see this as falling very 319 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:06,079 very heavily on them and at the same 320 00:11:06,079 --> 00:11:07,760 time i i want to agree 321 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:10,160 with pascal confident that i think the 322 00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:11,600 european union has done 323 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,640 a very commendable job of working to 324 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:16,480 make sure that this proposal is 325 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:19,920 is fair and is wto compatible 326 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:21,920 the devil is going to be in the details 327 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:23,600 i mean the issues that were raised right 328 00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:25,279 here at the end this issue where 329 00:11:25,279 --> 00:11:28,160 in the united states right now uh with 330 00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:30,000 the exception of our emissions trading 331 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:32,000 system in california and a few other 332 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:34,079 sort of smaller regional arrangements 333 00:11:34,079 --> 00:11:36,480 where the way in which the united states 334 00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:38,000 is getting down 335 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:40,399 its carbon emissions is entirely through 336 00:11:40,399 --> 00:11:42,000 regulatory mechanisms 337 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,240 uh both through you know again certain 338 00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:46,240 specific regulations with respect to how 339 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:47,600 power is generated 340 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:49,519 uh with regulations on emissions 341 00:11:49,519 --> 00:11:51,600 controls on on gasoline fuels and 342 00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:52,800 everything else 343 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:55,360 as well as incentives for the investment 344 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:56,320 in renewables 345 00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:59,279 that is very different than a carbon tax 346 00:11:59,279 --> 00:12:01,600 or an emissions trading system and so 347 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:04,079 and what becomes very tricky is if the 348 00:12:04,079 --> 00:12:05,200 european union 349 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,399 imposes a a a charge 350 00:12:08,399 --> 00:12:11,120 in the form of requiring u.s exporters 351 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:12,320 to buy 352 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:14,880 european emissions trading certificates 353 00:12:14,880 --> 00:12:15,519 um 354 00:12:15,519 --> 00:12:18,399 is that price in essence a fair one is 355 00:12:18,399 --> 00:12:20,000 it equivalent to what the european 356 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:21,600 industries are paying 357 00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:24,000 and is there a fair way to say oh but i 358 00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:26,560 effectively paid at home in the united 359 00:12:26,560 --> 00:12:27,040 states 360 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:28,959 because of the way in which my industry 361 00:12:28,959 --> 00:12:30,079 is regulated 362 00:12:30,079 --> 00:12:32,560 and and that's where the the rubs could 363 00:12:32,560 --> 00:12:33,200 come 364 00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:35,680 um and again i share pascal amy's real 365 00:12:35,680 --> 00:12:36,800 concern that the 366 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:39,600 goal on both sides of the atlantic is 367 00:12:39,600 --> 00:12:40,880 exactly the same 368 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:42,399 to get to net zero i'm going to 369 00:12:42,399 --> 00:12:43,839 interrupt jennifer let me let me just 370 00:12:43,839 --> 00:12:45,440 ask so that i understand again 371 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:47,120 i'm a layperson we have laypeople in the 372 00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:48,480 audience we also have a couple of these 373 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:49,839 young folks that are real experts i 374 00:12:49,839 --> 00:12:50,240 think 375 00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:51,680 but are you basically saying that 376 00:12:51,680 --> 00:12:53,839 american firm that has generated 377 00:12:53,839 --> 00:12:56,079 whatever widgets they're producing 378 00:12:56,079 --> 00:12:58,639 in that regulatory order may complain 379 00:12:58,639 --> 00:12:59,600 that they're being double 380 00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:01,360 taxed is that what you're you were 381 00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:03,120 correct correct 382 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:04,959 you know again and and again i want to 383 00:13:04,959 --> 00:13:06,399 commend the european commission and the 384 00:13:06,399 --> 00:13:08,639 european union for trying to figure this 385 00:13:08,639 --> 00:13:09,120 out 386 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:11,120 and again it remains to be seen the good 387 00:13:11,120 --> 00:13:12,720 news for everybody is they're starting 388 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:13,200 slow 389 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:14,959 there's only four industries that are 390 00:13:14,959 --> 00:13:16,880 you know in there in the very beginning 391 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:18,160 of this phase 392 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:19,600 you know and we're going to see kind of 393 00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:21,360 how it goes so we've got steel 394 00:13:21,360 --> 00:13:24,160 cement electricity fertilizer and iron 395 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:25,600 are the ones that are sort of out there 396 00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:26,560 at the beginning 397 00:13:26,560 --> 00:13:28,800 uh but that's exactly the concern is 398 00:13:28,800 --> 00:13:29,600 that a u.s 399 00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:31,680 exporter of steel is going to get 400 00:13:31,680 --> 00:13:32,720 charged you know 401 00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:34,720 they're gonna be told you have to pay 402 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:36,000 you have to buy uh 403 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:38,639 emissions uh certificates and the price 404 00:13:38,639 --> 00:13:39,279 of those is 405 00:13:39,279 --> 00:13:42,000 x um and they're gonna argue that that's 406 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:42,720 not fair 407 00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:45,040 uh that some that the uh that the you 408 00:13:45,040 --> 00:13:46,959 know european steel industry got a free 409 00:13:46,959 --> 00:13:48,560 allowance so they didn't actually have 410 00:13:48,560 --> 00:13:49,680 to pay as much 411 00:13:49,680 --> 00:13:51,120 that will be one argument they're gonna 412 00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:52,639 make they're gonna argue wait a minute 413 00:13:52,639 --> 00:13:54,720 wait a minute here i'm highly regulated 414 00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:56,399 in the united states in the following 415 00:13:56,399 --> 00:13:57,360 six ways 416 00:13:57,360 --> 00:14:00,320 so i have effectively paid a carbon 417 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:02,480 price already in the united states and 418 00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:03,360 you aren't 419 00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:05,680 fairly recognizing it that's going to be 420 00:14:05,680 --> 00:14:06,880 the argument from 421 00:14:06,880 --> 00:14:08,800 from u.s exporters that are trying to 422 00:14:08,800 --> 00:14:10,240 get their product in 423 00:14:10,240 --> 00:14:12,240 into the eu and again it remains to be 424 00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:14,320 seen whether they have a good argument 425 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:17,360 or not i can see pascal about jumping 426 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:18,639 out of his chair like saying you know 427 00:14:18,639 --> 00:14:20,000 just waiting to wrestle 428 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:21,760 uh you know those people complaining 429 00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:23,279 down but we've got christian here 430 00:14:23,279 --> 00:14:24,720 christian i think and i'm trying to 431 00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:26,399 understand the technical dimensions of 432 00:14:26,399 --> 00:14:27,279 this somewhat 433 00:14:27,279 --> 00:14:29,920 of a tax that sort of has a ledger where 434 00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:31,600 you've got you know inputs outputs and 435 00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:32,160 they sort of 436 00:14:32,160 --> 00:14:34,639 equal each other but i guess i'm used to 437 00:14:34,639 --> 00:14:36,320 thinking about you know the whole reason 438 00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:37,760 you put this in place is you're trying 439 00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:39,440 to create winners and losers 440 00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:40,959 right you're winners and losers within 441 00:14:40,959 --> 00:14:42,720 the political economy and you try to 442 00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:44,800 create winners that are going to be more 443 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:47,519 uh uh environmentally sustainable 444 00:14:47,519 --> 00:14:49,760 practices versus losers that aren't or 445 00:14:49,760 --> 00:14:50,720 that pay for that so 446 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:52,880 i'm interested in what you see as the 447 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:53,839 impacts 448 00:14:53,839 --> 00:14:57,199 of this kind of tax on getting to a more 449 00:14:57,199 --> 00:15:00,959 sustainable world if you will but also 450 00:15:00,959 --> 00:15:03,360 is the ledger really that balanced is 451 00:15:03,360 --> 00:15:04,399 there not revenue 452 00:15:04,399 --> 00:15:05,839 made are there not offsets that we 453 00:15:05,839 --> 00:15:08,000 should be talking about yeah i mean 454 00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:10,480 you heard it and i i you heard the 455 00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:12,720 concerns and i'm just wondering hearing 456 00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:13,360 this 457 00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:15,839 whether we are not creating a 458 00:15:15,839 --> 00:15:17,760 administrative monster with all these 459 00:15:17,760 --> 00:15:19,760 complications devil is in the detail and 460 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:20,480 as we go 461 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:23,519 there are more devils and more details 462 00:15:23,519 --> 00:15:26,639 for achieving what you mentioned 463 00:15:26,639 --> 00:15:30,480 we looked at in the european university 464 00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:32,240 institute we looked at 465 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:34,399 cement just to do some back of the 466 00:15:34,399 --> 00:15:36,079 envelope calculations 467 00:15:36,079 --> 00:15:39,440 and you see that north africa 468 00:15:39,440 --> 00:15:43,279 carbon intensity is lower than in europe 469 00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:45,519 and if even in ukraine is much higher 470 00:15:45,519 --> 00:15:47,279 but actually the differences between the 471 00:15:47,279 --> 00:15:48,320 europeans 472 00:15:48,320 --> 00:15:51,440 and the and the non-europeans 473 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,680 that's cement is traded in europe mainly 474 00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:54,880 is not that big 475 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:57,360 so the question for mir is what are we 476 00:15:57,360 --> 00:15:58,639 achieving with this 477 00:15:58,639 --> 00:16:02,000 and getting uh to your question we 478 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:05,360 put out 10 years ago so we have some 479 00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:07,040 good credentials for carbon border 480 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:08,800 attacks we put out 10 years ago a book 481 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:10,079 and arguing for it 482 00:16:10,079 --> 00:16:12,160 but i think by now the time has has 483 00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:14,399 changed we have now the paris agreement 484 00:16:14,399 --> 00:16:15,440 where we have one 485 00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:19,440 agreement of which everybody is part and 486 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:22,320 what i think the big question for the 487 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:23,440 future is 488 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:26,800 how do we incentivize this investment 489 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:30,240 into the low carbon the green steel 490 00:16:30,240 --> 00:16:33,120 into the green sea green cement green 491 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:35,040 chemicals and so on and so on so that's 492 00:16:35,040 --> 00:16:36,560 the big questions 493 00:16:36,560 --> 00:16:39,680 i'm a bit worried we are protecting 494 00:16:39,680 --> 00:16:42,720 uh the old industries uh too much and 495 00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:43,360 that's 496 00:16:43,360 --> 00:16:45,759 why my question to uh monsieur garfield 497 00:16:45,759 --> 00:16:46,800 is you know why 498 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,000 do we keep the free allocation why 499 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:51,680 don't we go over take the free 500 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:53,199 allocation away because 501 00:16:53,199 --> 00:16:56,000 then the devils the details are much 502 00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:56,720 smaller 503 00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:59,600 and will be much much more easy and you 504 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:00,000 know 505 00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:02,480 we have a lot of money in the free 506 00:17:02,480 --> 00:17:04,720 allocation we did some calculations 507 00:17:04,720 --> 00:17:08,319 using eu numbers commission numbers 508 00:17:08,319 --> 00:17:11,439 and we talked about free allocation 509 00:17:11,439 --> 00:17:14,959 at the level of 350 billion 510 00:17:14,959 --> 00:17:17,919 in the next nine years that's half the 511 00:17:17,919 --> 00:17:19,520 recovery package 512 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:21,520 now why do we keep this and that's i 513 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:22,559 think is a question 514 00:17:22,559 --> 00:17:25,760 for me to mr kraft and maybe jennifer 515 00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:26,559 certainly has 516 00:17:26,559 --> 00:17:28,640 something to say mr chairman what is 517 00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:31,120 what are your thoughts pascal 518 00:17:31,120 --> 00:17:33,679 well you know i'm definitely not in 519 00:17:33,679 --> 00:17:34,480 favor 520 00:17:34,480 --> 00:17:37,039 of keeping the free alliances so i'm 521 00:17:37,039 --> 00:17:38,960 exactly on the same line than the 522 00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:40,720 christian the commission the european 523 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:42,799 commission will make the formal proposal 524 00:17:42,799 --> 00:17:44,480 we will see what it will be 525 00:17:44,480 --> 00:17:47,280 but of course keeping freezing i would 526 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:47,919 say 527 00:17:47,919 --> 00:17:50,480 uh uh the free allocation system as it 528 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:51,360 is today 529 00:17:51,360 --> 00:17:53,600 would be uh completely counterproductive 530 00:17:53,600 --> 00:17:55,360 for the very exact reason that was 531 00:17:55,360 --> 00:17:56,960 mentioned by christian 532 00:17:56,960 --> 00:17:59,840 uh back to what jennifer said i mean you 533 00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:00,799 raised two 534 00:18:00,799 --> 00:18:03,919 potential concerns and i 535 00:18:03,919 --> 00:18:06,480 try to answer and to anticipate this 536 00:18:06,480 --> 00:18:07,280 concern 537 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:09,760 because we do have the same and we do 538 00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:11,760 want to be wto compatible 539 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:15,200 so meaning that if you have 540 00:18:15,200 --> 00:18:18,480 free allowances which we shouldn't have 541 00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:19,919 back to what has just said and what 542 00:18:19,919 --> 00:18:22,240 christian said but if ever 543 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:24,559 we have free allowances still in the 544 00:18:24,559 --> 00:18:25,600 system 545 00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:28,640 of course of course the cbam 546 00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:32,160 will have to incorporate this and to 547 00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:34,559 make requirements for the u.s steel 548 00:18:34,559 --> 00:18:35,280 makers 549 00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:38,640 only on the scope of what is really 550 00:18:38,640 --> 00:18:40,320 effectively paid 551 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:43,440 by the european seed makers so no doubt 552 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:44,000 about it 553 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,840 no issue second explicit versus implicit 554 00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:48,799 price 555 00:18:48,799 --> 00:18:51,360 you're right and as i said if there is a 556 00:18:51,360 --> 00:18:53,440 regulation in the u.s 557 00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:56,960 that leads to the greening of the 558 00:18:56,960 --> 00:19:00,160 steel production in the u.s 559 00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:02,799 and that you can demonstrate that it is 560 00:19:02,799 --> 00:19:03,679 equivalent 561 00:19:03,679 --> 00:19:07,280 to the eu system critical price on steel 562 00:19:07,280 --> 00:19:09,760 no issue and then there will be no sebam 563 00:19:09,760 --> 00:19:10,480 so again 564 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:13,360 i mean we are working on it so let's not 565 00:19:13,360 --> 00:19:14,160 create 566 00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:16,880 uh just a bad buzz about it because we 567 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:17,360 shared 568 00:19:17,360 --> 00:19:19,919 exactly the same vision but you have to 569 00:19:19,919 --> 00:19:20,880 understand 570 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:23,600 the starting point the starting point is 571 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:24,240 that 572 00:19:24,240 --> 00:19:27,679 we cannot ask our industries 573 00:19:27,679 --> 00:19:30,720 to pay 50 60 70 574 00:19:30,720 --> 00:19:34,240 80 euros per turn of co2 and being 575 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:35,280 competed 576 00:19:35,280 --> 00:19:38,559 by companies being either zero or 577 00:19:38,559 --> 00:19:41,039 having no standard so that's why with 578 00:19:41,039 --> 00:19:42,240 the us 579 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:45,520 we should be able to find the agreement 580 00:19:45,520 --> 00:19:48,640 based exactly on the current discussion 581 00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:51,760 but with china there will be no standard 582 00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:53,919 and a price of let's say one or two 583 00:19:53,919 --> 00:19:55,039 dollars 584 00:19:55,039 --> 00:19:57,760 and christian was right to say that okay 585 00:19:57,760 --> 00:19:58,880 we have all 586 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:01,280 uh signed the paris agreement but let's 587 00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:02,559 face reality 588 00:20:02,559 --> 00:20:04,640 we are not all implementing the paris 589 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:06,880 agreement at least at the same pace 590 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:09,200 so i can't see how come i can go to the 591 00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:10,159 european 592 00:20:10,159 --> 00:20:12,880 uh uh 593 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:15,919 sorry as workers in the seed industry in 594 00:20:15,919 --> 00:20:17,360 the fertilizer industry in the 595 00:20:17,360 --> 00:20:19,200 electricity industry and so on and so on 596 00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:20,000 i say okay 597 00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:22,480 you're going to get fired because there 598 00:20:22,480 --> 00:20:23,200 is no 599 00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:26,480 uh equity a fair competition between you 600 00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:27,679 china and the u.s 601 00:20:27,679 --> 00:20:29,520 i cannot do that and politically 602 00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:31,039 speaking no 603 00:20:31,039 --> 00:20:34,000 political leader in the eu will do so 604 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:34,799 that's why 605 00:20:34,799 --> 00:20:37,520 there is a wide political backing of the 606 00:20:37,520 --> 00:20:38,400 sebam 607 00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:41,840 designed exactly as i just mentioned 608 00:20:41,840 --> 00:20:43,760 let me ask a political question of 609 00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:45,840 jennifer so i have uh 610 00:20:45,840 --> 00:20:47,520 spent a lot of time recently with a 611 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:49,600 controversial u.s senator at the moment 612 00:20:49,600 --> 00:20:50,480 he's sort of 613 00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:52,159 you know the the senator that everybody 614 00:20:52,159 --> 00:20:54,320 wants to to have to dinner senator joe 615 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:54,960 manchin 616 00:20:54,960 --> 00:20:56,720 and senator manchin in the united states 617 00:20:56,720 --> 00:20:58,720 is from a state called west virginia 618 00:20:58,720 --> 00:21:00,880 west virginia is a major coal state a 619 00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:02,320 coal producing state 620 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:05,520 and i'm just interested jennifer in 621 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:08,640 if we were to take the european model uh 622 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:10,000 that we're talking about this border 623 00:21:10,000 --> 00:21:11,039 adjustable 624 00:21:11,039 --> 00:21:13,600 you know tax and we had that kind of 625 00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:14,559 application 626 00:21:14,559 --> 00:21:16,080 in the united states what would happen 627 00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:17,440 to west virginia because what i'm 628 00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:18,880 interested i'd also like to bring into 629 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:20,000 this discussion 630 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:22,080 as we go back to that question you just 631 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:23,039 mentioned china 632 00:21:23,039 --> 00:21:25,760 and we have dissimilar countries also 633 00:21:25,760 --> 00:21:27,039 you know committing themselves to 634 00:21:27,039 --> 00:21:28,400 certain climate targets 635 00:21:28,400 --> 00:21:30,480 and we have a kind of openness on how we 636 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:32,400 get there jennifer hillman co-authored a 637 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:34,400 paper i highly recommend to folks at the 638 00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:36,000 council on foreign relations site on the 639 00:21:36,000 --> 00:21:36,880 belton road 640 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:38,880 uh china's belt and road initiative goes 641 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:40,080 into a lot of these issues 642 00:21:40,080 --> 00:21:41,760 very worthwhile talking but i'm 643 00:21:41,760 --> 00:21:43,520 interested in how 644 00:21:43,520 --> 00:21:44,640 particularly in the united states 645 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:46,559 jennifer you help transitions 646 00:21:46,559 --> 00:21:48,640 how do you fund transitions of people's 647 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:50,640 lives you know the work they do 648 00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:52,400 you know pascal just talked about this 649 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:55,120 so i don't think america solves this 650 00:21:55,120 --> 00:21:57,440 with the power of a joe manchin until we 651 00:21:57,440 --> 00:21:59,200 begin answering that question 652 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:02,080 and i'm wondering what your thoughts are 653 00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:04,080 well again i i think the us has taken a 654 00:22:04,080 --> 00:22:05,039 lot of different 655 00:22:05,039 --> 00:22:07,440 approaches to the whole panoply of what 656 00:22:07,440 --> 00:22:09,360 you're raising in your question 657 00:22:09,360 --> 00:22:11,600 i mean one is what are we going to do on 658 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:13,280 on regulating carbon and 659 00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:15,679 and as you know years ago there was a 660 00:22:15,679 --> 00:22:17,440 you know fairly serious proposals in the 661 00:22:17,440 --> 00:22:18,000 senate 662 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:19,919 for the united states to establish an 663 00:22:19,919 --> 00:22:21,600 emissions trading system somewhat 664 00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:23,360 similar to the european union system 665 00:22:23,360 --> 00:22:24,240 where we would 666 00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,600 auction off um permits to continue to 667 00:22:27,600 --> 00:22:29,280 emit and this would have been something 668 00:22:29,280 --> 00:22:30,799 that the coal producers would have had 669 00:22:30,799 --> 00:22:32,240 to do they would have had to purchase a 670 00:22:32,240 --> 00:22:33,039 fair amount 671 00:22:33,039 --> 00:22:34,880 of emissions certificates and we would 672 00:22:34,880 --> 00:22:36,159 have had a trading system 673 00:22:36,159 --> 00:22:38,640 that went through part way but never got 674 00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:40,080 completely enacted 675 00:22:40,080 --> 00:22:42,880 then the shift was to go to a carbon tax 676 00:22:42,880 --> 00:22:45,280 in the united states and there are still 677 00:22:45,280 --> 00:22:47,840 many proposals out there that may get 678 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:48,640 support 679 00:22:48,640 --> 00:22:50,880 uh to enact a carbon tax in the united 680 00:22:50,880 --> 00:22:53,280 states again that tax would fall 681 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:56,400 most heavily on coal producers and 682 00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:58,320 others because of the amount of carbon 683 00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:00,559 that is embedded in what they do 684 00:23:00,559 --> 00:23:02,640 uh and the issue is then what would the 685 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:03,919 united states then do 686 00:23:03,919 --> 00:23:05,679 in response to try to help those coal 687 00:23:05,679 --> 00:23:07,200 producers but your question 688 00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:09,760 also raises just in general what do we 689 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:10,480 do for 690 00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:13,520 any american workers that are impacted 691 00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:16,480 by trade you know by imports coming in 692 00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:17,679 that they have to compete with 693 00:23:17,679 --> 00:23:20,480 or broadly and there i think there is a 694 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:21,600 huge 695 00:23:21,600 --> 00:23:24,080 recognition that we have not done well i 696 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:25,679 mean we have simply not done 697 00:23:25,679 --> 00:23:28,480 enough to try to figure out how to 698 00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:29,919 transition both 699 00:23:29,919 --> 00:23:31,760 the individual workers and the 700 00:23:31,760 --> 00:23:33,760 communities that are heavily impacted 701 00:23:33,760 --> 00:23:35,919 whether it's heavily impacted by imports 702 00:23:35,919 --> 00:23:37,520 or whether it's heavily impacted by a 703 00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:38,400 new carbon 704 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:40,320 system we have got to do better than 705 00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:42,000 what we've done what we've done so far 706 00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:44,080 is limited so-called trade adjustment 707 00:23:44,080 --> 00:23:44,799 assistance 708 00:23:44,799 --> 00:23:46,720 that if you can prove that you lost your 709 00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:48,480 job as a result of trade 710 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:51,039 you can get limited amounts we've seen 711 00:23:51,039 --> 00:23:53,840 now with covid a huge move to expand the 712 00:23:53,840 --> 00:23:55,279 amount of unemployment insurance 713 00:23:55,279 --> 00:23:56,240 benefits 714 00:23:56,240 --> 00:23:58,240 and others but this is going to have to 715 00:23:58,240 --> 00:23:59,919 be part of a broader package 716 00:23:59,919 --> 00:24:03,200 whatever adoption the united states does 717 00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:05,279 for carbon adjustments it is going to 718 00:24:05,279 --> 00:24:06,480 have to include 719 00:24:06,480 --> 00:24:08,480 a significant amount of worker training 720 00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:09,679 uh programs 721 00:24:09,679 --> 00:24:11,360 it's going to have to include investment 722 00:24:11,360 --> 00:24:13,840 in the renewable energy so i mean what 723 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:16,000 clearly the biden plan is is to 724 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:17,679 encourage those coal workers to now 725 00:24:17,679 --> 00:24:18,159 become 726 00:24:18,159 --> 00:24:21,520 solar workers or wind workers or those 727 00:24:21,520 --> 00:24:23,360 involved in the production of renewable 728 00:24:23,360 --> 00:24:24,720 energy instead of 729 00:24:24,720 --> 00:24:26,880 being involved in the production of coal 730 00:24:26,880 --> 00:24:28,159 and obviously 731 00:24:28,159 --> 00:24:29,679 there's a lot of work that needs to be 732 00:24:29,679 --> 00:24:32,320 done in order to make those transition 733 00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:35,200 realistic and possible thank you for 734 00:24:35,200 --> 00:24:36,799 that i want to remind everyone that you 735 00:24:36,799 --> 00:24:38,159 can ask questions on 736 00:24:38,159 --> 00:24:41,120 any element of climate or you can ask a 737 00:24:41,120 --> 00:24:41,520 tax 738 00:24:41,520 --> 00:24:43,120 uh obsessed question too because we've 739 00:24:43,120 --> 00:24:44,960 got real tax experts here 740 00:24:44,960 --> 00:24:47,120 on your app or we'll we'll bring people 741 00:24:47,120 --> 00:24:48,720 up here uh in just a little bit 742 00:24:48,720 --> 00:24:50,640 but let me ask you know go to christian 743 00:24:50,640 --> 00:24:52,480 and all of you you know on this kind of 744 00:24:52,480 --> 00:24:53,360 broader question 745 00:24:53,360 --> 00:24:55,679 of how you transition economies and i'm 746 00:24:55,679 --> 00:24:57,039 just intrigued with what 747 00:24:57,039 --> 00:24:59,520 what pascal has a uh what i would call 748 00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:00,799 an elegant 749 00:25:00,799 --> 00:25:03,520 and fascinating construct to look at 750 00:25:03,520 --> 00:25:03,919 something 751 00:25:03,919 --> 00:25:05,760 and i'm always interested if europe were 752 00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:07,600 able to achieve that and put that in 753 00:25:07,600 --> 00:25:08,240 place 754 00:25:08,240 --> 00:25:11,440 does that create uh uh you know that 755 00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:13,760 sophistication that ability that ease of 756 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:14,480 managing 757 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:16,559 you know carbons and creating pressures 758 00:25:16,559 --> 00:25:17,520 in the right place 759 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:20,720 does that create a competitive advantage 760 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:23,039 long run for its industry and states 761 00:25:23,039 --> 00:25:25,120 versus china versus india 762 00:25:25,120 --> 00:25:27,520 versus the united states that have 763 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:28,400 uneven 764 00:25:28,400 --> 00:25:30,480 uh deals there so do you i mean i'm just 765 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:31,600 sort of looking at this as something 766 00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:32,640 that could be 767 00:25:32,640 --> 00:25:34,480 uh does it create for europe certain 768 00:25:34,480 --> 00:25:35,760 competitive advantages 769 00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:37,440 that the rest of the world won't enjoy 770 00:25:37,440 --> 00:25:39,520 because it's just behind you 771 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:42,320 um christian you know i have my serious 772 00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:43,120 doubts and 773 00:25:43,120 --> 00:25:44,880 you know sorry pascal have to come back 774 00:25:44,880 --> 00:25:46,720 to the free allocation and i fully 775 00:25:46,720 --> 00:25:48,480 understand that's part of the deal 776 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,120 uh to get this done but if you look at 777 00:25:51,120 --> 00:25:52,559 the the current system 778 00:25:52,559 --> 00:25:54,640 we are giving the free allocation to our 779 00:25:54,640 --> 00:25:56,640 existing installations 780 00:25:56,640 --> 00:25:58,720 and if you're going down the route of 781 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:00,080 green steel 782 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:01,600 for the audience free allocation 783 00:26:01,600 --> 00:26:03,279 protects incumbents right 784 00:26:03,279 --> 00:26:05,279 yes that that you know protects the 785 00:26:05,279 --> 00:26:06,960 existing installation because they have 786 00:26:06,960 --> 00:26:07,840 a carbon cost 787 00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:10,799 and some other way to seduce the men yes 788 00:26:10,799 --> 00:26:11,120 okay 789 00:26:11,120 --> 00:26:13,520 yeah i mean the bribe you know which we 790 00:26:13,520 --> 00:26:15,279 did in 2000 i didn't want to say the 791 00:26:15,279 --> 00:26:16,080 word bribe 792 00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:18,159 but you know yeah you know i'm european 793 00:26:18,159 --> 00:26:19,200 i can't say that 794 00:26:19,200 --> 00:26:22,880 um so you know so what is happening now 795 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:26,240 is that we are subsidizing or 796 00:26:26,240 --> 00:26:27,919 you know supporting existing 797 00:26:27,919 --> 00:26:29,600 installations for all the reasons which 798 00:26:29,600 --> 00:26:31,440 just jennifer has 799 00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:33,679 explained but once you go down the route 800 00:26:33,679 --> 00:26:36,000 of investing in low carbon cement in low 801 00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:37,200 carbon steel 802 00:26:37,200 --> 00:26:39,520 you don't get this reallocation huh and 803 00:26:39,520 --> 00:26:41,840 that is for me the main concerns if we 804 00:26:41,840 --> 00:26:44,000 want to be competitive in 2030 805 00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:45,919 we need a low carb steel low carbon 806 00:26:45,919 --> 00:26:47,520 cement so how do we 807 00:26:47,520 --> 00:26:50,720 bridge that gap supporting the old 808 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:51,520 industries 809 00:26:51,520 --> 00:26:54,960 and don't give the same support or 810 00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:57,279 the support to the new industries and in 811 00:26:57,279 --> 00:26:58,559 fact we don't know what these new 812 00:26:58,559 --> 00:26:59,760 industries will be 813 00:26:59,760 --> 00:27:02,880 will still be substituted by plastics 814 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:05,200 will we have more as recycled steel will 815 00:27:05,200 --> 00:27:06,000 be using more 816 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:07,840 wood and all this steel gets the 817 00:27:07,840 --> 00:27:09,679 allocation wood doesn't 818 00:27:09,679 --> 00:27:12,960 so that's will be a big challenge for us 819 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:13,520 to be 820 00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:15,760 competitive in this 2030 perspective and 821 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:17,600 beyond let's jump back to pascal 822 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:19,760 and say am i right off i mean respond to 823 00:27:19,760 --> 00:27:21,360 christian as you will but also 824 00:27:21,360 --> 00:27:23,279 answer my question whether the regime 825 00:27:23,279 --> 00:27:24,640 you're building 826 00:27:24,640 --> 00:27:26,480 actually creates a long-term competitive 827 00:27:26,480 --> 00:27:27,840 advantage for those 828 00:27:27,840 --> 00:27:31,200 industries in it in contrast to the u.s 829 00:27:31,200 --> 00:27:32,080 side which just 830 00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:34,720 as jennifer pointed out is so uneven i 831 00:27:34,720 --> 00:27:36,720 mean i mean i talk to ceos 832 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:38,559 all the time in the united states and 833 00:27:38,559 --> 00:27:40,480 they are either working around 834 00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:41,840 government issues or i talk to the ceo 835 00:27:41,840 --> 00:27:43,039 of occidental via they're going to build 836 00:27:43,039 --> 00:27:44,320 the biggest carbon capture 837 00:27:44,320 --> 00:27:45,520 site but that's going to be a function 838 00:27:45,520 --> 00:27:47,279 of government subsidies so you create a 839 00:27:47,279 --> 00:27:49,200 lot of unevenness there that's why 840 00:27:49,200 --> 00:27:51,520 i'm interested in the in the elegance of 841 00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:53,279 the plan that you're putting forward and 842 00:27:53,279 --> 00:27:54,080 talking about 843 00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:55,200 and i'm just wondering in the long run 844 00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:56,799 whether that also creates strategic 845 00:27:56,799 --> 00:27:59,840 economic advantages 846 00:27:59,840 --> 00:28:03,440 well so it's our conviction and then of 847 00:28:03,440 --> 00:28:04,480 course i'm not talking 848 00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:06,320 only about siberman talking about the 849 00:28:06,320 --> 00:28:07,679 whole the whole thing 850 00:28:07,679 --> 00:28:10,000 uh what we call uh in the european 851 00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:11,440 context the green deal 852 00:28:11,440 --> 00:28:14,399 so i know that in the u.s uh the the the 853 00:28:14,399 --> 00:28:14,799 term 854 00:28:14,799 --> 00:28:18,640 is is uh isn't it's not mainstream but 855 00:28:18,640 --> 00:28:20,240 in the eu it is mainstream where 856 00:28:20,240 --> 00:28:22,240 everybody talks about the green deal 857 00:28:22,240 --> 00:28:24,640 and the green deal means that we are 858 00:28:24,640 --> 00:28:26,000 going to change 859 00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:29,760 more than 50 five zero 50 lows 860 00:28:29,760 --> 00:28:33,120 european lows from now on up to 861 00:28:33,120 --> 00:28:36,399 the end of 2022 and on 862 00:28:36,399 --> 00:28:40,159 the 14th of july the commission will 863 00:28:40,159 --> 00:28:41,600 propose the change of 864 00:28:41,600 --> 00:28:45,440 13 1 three lows out of this 50 865 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:48,159 and one of them is the sebam another one 866 00:28:48,159 --> 00:28:50,080 is the reform of the carbon market and 867 00:28:50,080 --> 00:28:51,039 so on and so on 868 00:28:51,039 --> 00:28:54,159 so that's massive that's unprecedented 869 00:28:54,159 --> 00:28:55,360 and massive 870 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:59,440 and of course if we do so of course the 871 00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:02,000 number one reason is climate it's 872 00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:02,480 obvious 873 00:29:02,480 --> 00:29:03,840 it's obvious and i don't have to 874 00:29:03,840 --> 00:29:06,159 elaborate more on this but the second 875 00:29:06,159 --> 00:29:06,559 reason 876 00:29:06,559 --> 00:29:09,279 is that it is not only our duty to do so 877 00:29:09,279 --> 00:29:09,760 but 878 00:29:09,760 --> 00:29:12,880 it is our interest to do so it is in 879 00:29:12,880 --> 00:29:16,559 our interest because uh there are 880 00:29:16,559 --> 00:29:21,120 a few industrial challenges ahead of us 881 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:24,720 obviously the digital one obviously the 882 00:29:24,720 --> 00:29:27,039 decarbonization of our economy and going 883 00:29:27,039 --> 00:29:29,520 net zero by 2050 884 00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:32,640 and the one the europeans 885 00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:36,399 can win is the decarbonization one 886 00:29:36,399 --> 00:29:38,960 the digital one we are still in the race 887 00:29:38,960 --> 00:29:40,880 but to be honest let's face reality 888 00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:41,520 again 889 00:29:41,520 --> 00:29:44,799 it's mainly about the us and china 890 00:29:44,799 --> 00:29:47,760 the decarbonization one we are leading 891 00:29:47,760 --> 00:29:48,559 it 892 00:29:48,559 --> 00:29:51,120 and the more we put standards in place 893 00:29:51,120 --> 00:29:52,960 the more we've changed the rules of the 894 00:29:52,960 --> 00:29:53,440 game 895 00:29:53,440 --> 00:29:55,640 but again within the game of the 896 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:57,039 multilateralism 897 00:29:57,039 --> 00:29:59,440 and the multilateral rules we set and we 898 00:29:59,440 --> 00:30:00,320 agreed on 899 00:30:00,320 --> 00:30:02,240 that's the dna of the eu and the 900 00:30:02,240 --> 00:30:04,080 european mindset 901 00:30:04,080 --> 00:30:08,080 the more economic gain we want to to 902 00:30:08,080 --> 00:30:08,799 have 903 00:30:08,799 --> 00:30:10,559 and the big difference so we are we with 904 00:30:10,559 --> 00:30:12,640 the u.s at least today 905 00:30:12,640 --> 00:30:14,960 it was not the case in the past but at 906 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:16,559 least today we are 907 00:30:16,559 --> 00:30:20,640 100 aligned on what where we want to go 908 00:30:20,640 --> 00:30:22,320 the only difference and it's a big 909 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:24,480 difference between the us and the eu 910 00:30:24,480 --> 00:30:27,760 is that you are one of the uh 911 00:30:27,760 --> 00:30:31,440 uh most of the largest 912 00:30:31,440 --> 00:30:36,559 uh fossil exporter and producer 913 00:30:36,559 --> 00:30:39,760 we are the largest fossil 914 00:30:39,760 --> 00:30:43,120 importer we do not have any fossil in 915 00:30:43,120 --> 00:30:44,480 europe 916 00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:47,120 very small scale for gas no petrol no 917 00:30:47,120 --> 00:30:47,919 oil and 918 00:30:47,919 --> 00:30:50,159 a coal but we are committed to decrease 919 00:30:50,159 --> 00:30:52,320 it exactly at the u.s right 920 00:30:52,320 --> 00:30:54,320 we do not have shell guys and so on so 921 00:30:54,320 --> 00:30:56,559 because you are an empty continent we 922 00:30:56,559 --> 00:30:58,320 are a full continent with full of people 923 00:30:58,320 --> 00:30:59,120 everywhere 924 00:30:59,120 --> 00:31:01,600 right that's the big difference and 925 00:31:01,600 --> 00:31:02,159 that's why 926 00:31:02,159 --> 00:31:05,440 it is even more and maybe uh it would be 927 00:31:05,440 --> 00:31:06,399 contested by the 928 00:31:06,399 --> 00:31:09,360 by by jennifer but it's even more in our 929 00:31:09,360 --> 00:31:11,919 economic interest as europeans 930 00:31:11,919 --> 00:31:14,640 to go greener and to decarbonize because 931 00:31:14,640 --> 00:31:14,960 we 932 00:31:14,960 --> 00:31:18,080 when you look at the u.s china eu 933 00:31:18,080 --> 00:31:20,559 the eu as a whole so germany plus france 934 00:31:20,559 --> 00:31:21,919 presents and so on 935 00:31:21,919 --> 00:31:25,120 we are the block having 936 00:31:25,120 --> 00:31:28,240 the lead on green patterns on low carbon 937 00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:31,039 licenses we are the leaders there right 938 00:31:31,039 --> 00:31:31,360 right 939 00:31:31,360 --> 00:31:34,000 then second china third ua right so 940 00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:35,679 that's why we consider that it is 941 00:31:35,679 --> 00:31:37,360 clearly our economic interest to get 942 00:31:37,360 --> 00:31:39,279 there and to change progressively all 943 00:31:39,279 --> 00:31:40,080 the set of the 944 00:31:40,080 --> 00:31:42,399 of rules including carbon price 945 00:31:42,399 --> 00:31:44,320 including sebam and so on and so on and 946 00:31:44,320 --> 00:31:46,559 last point from my side very last one 947 00:31:46,559 --> 00:31:50,320 is that the political maturity 948 00:31:50,320 --> 00:31:53,279 in the eu of the debates of the 949 00:31:53,279 --> 00:31:55,519 relationship between climate action and 950 00:31:55,519 --> 00:31:56,799 trade 951 00:31:56,799 --> 00:31:59,840 is now real it was not the case three 952 00:31:59,840 --> 00:32:01,200 four years ago 953 00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:04,159 now it's clearly part of the debate we 954 00:32:04,159 --> 00:32:06,799 do want to have trade we do want to be 955 00:32:06,799 --> 00:32:09,440 open we do want to be wto compatible we 956 00:32:09,440 --> 00:32:10,799 do want to have additional trade 957 00:32:10,799 --> 00:32:13,600 agreements and so on and so on but 958 00:32:13,600 --> 00:32:16,000 we want to be consistent between our 959 00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:16,960 trade policies 960 00:32:16,960 --> 00:32:19,919 and our climate policies that's why we 961 00:32:19,919 --> 00:32:21,840 for instance we are 962 00:32:21,840 --> 00:32:24,559 probably not going to ratify the 963 00:32:24,559 --> 00:32:26,240 mercosur agreement 964 00:32:26,240 --> 00:32:28,320 because we cannot sign an agreement now 965 00:32:28,320 --> 00:32:30,399 with bolsonaro doing what he does 966 00:32:30,399 --> 00:32:32,559 on climate and on biodiversity with 967 00:32:32,559 --> 00:32:33,679 amazonia 968 00:32:33,679 --> 00:32:36,480 that's that's the core now of the dna of 969 00:32:36,480 --> 00:32:38,640 the global vision of the eu and i hope 970 00:32:38,640 --> 00:32:40,880 i hope that the us will be with us on 971 00:32:40,880 --> 00:32:42,720 this well thank you for that i want to 972 00:32:42,720 --> 00:32:44,399 go to jennifer hillman ask her to reach 973 00:32:44,399 --> 00:32:46,880 deep down and find her inner trade 974 00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:47,760 warrior 975 00:32:47,760 --> 00:32:49,919 uh and and ask her you know as she looks 976 00:32:49,919 --> 00:32:51,919 at the wto she looks at 977 00:32:51,919 --> 00:32:53,919 uh companies here and as i'm listening 978 00:32:53,919 --> 00:32:55,760 to pascal talk about what his 979 00:32:55,760 --> 00:32:57,440 hopes are in compliance but you know 980 00:32:57,440 --> 00:32:58,960 just in the way you talked about well if 981 00:32:58,960 --> 00:32:59,360 you know 982 00:32:59,360 --> 00:33:01,519 steel industry can show that it has 983 00:33:01,519 --> 00:33:03,360 achieved equality here 984 00:33:03,360 --> 00:33:04,640 it just sort of seems to be would go 985 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:06,799 back to what christian said you create 986 00:33:06,799 --> 00:33:09,440 essentially machinery that needs to 987 00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:10,320 that'll be 988 00:33:10,320 --> 00:33:13,120 good business for waivers and you know 989 00:33:13,120 --> 00:33:14,559 political calculations 990 00:33:14,559 --> 00:33:16,000 and i'm just wondering and that leads 991 00:33:16,000 --> 00:33:17,840 you to trade disputes jennifer is there 992 00:33:17,840 --> 00:33:19,039 a way to do this 993 00:33:19,039 --> 00:33:22,840 without just a mountain of trade 994 00:33:22,840 --> 00:33:24,240 disputes 995 00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:26,240 uh i think it's very hard to think about 996 00:33:26,240 --> 00:33:28,799 doing it because again the the basic wto 997 00:33:28,799 --> 00:33:29,760 rules are 998 00:33:29,760 --> 00:33:31,760 you can only put a charge on at the 999 00:33:31,760 --> 00:33:33,760 border a tariff if you will that is 1000 00:33:33,760 --> 00:33:35,519 sort of in your schedule and the 1001 00:33:35,519 --> 00:33:37,279 schedules don't allow 1002 00:33:37,279 --> 00:33:39,679 for this additional tariff to be charged 1003 00:33:39,679 --> 00:33:41,679 on imports because of carbon 1004 00:33:41,679 --> 00:33:43,840 so the only way that you can do this 1005 00:33:43,840 --> 00:33:45,679 fairly is to say that it is the 1006 00:33:45,679 --> 00:33:47,440 equivalent of whatever your domestic 1007 00:33:47,440 --> 00:33:48,799 industry is paying 1008 00:33:48,799 --> 00:33:50,880 so it is always going to require this 1009 00:33:50,880 --> 00:33:52,000 calculation of how much 1010 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:54,480 does your domestic industry pay for 1011 00:33:54,480 --> 00:33:55,200 carbon 1012 00:33:55,200 --> 00:33:57,039 versus how much are you charging at the 1013 00:33:57,039 --> 00:33:59,519 border so it's hard to see how you 1014 00:33:59,519 --> 00:34:02,080 get out of that um you know sort of 1015 00:34:02,080 --> 00:34:04,320 mechanics of having to do that kind of a 1016 00:34:04,320 --> 00:34:06,240 calculation so uh 1017 00:34:06,240 --> 00:34:08,000 the concern that i would have again i i 1018 00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:09,760 commend the european union i think this 1019 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:11,679 proposal has gone as far as they could 1020 00:34:11,679 --> 00:34:13,359 possibly go to trying to make sure 1021 00:34:13,359 --> 00:34:15,839 it is fundamentally consistent with 1022 00:34:15,839 --> 00:34:17,599 their wto obligations and 1023 00:34:17,599 --> 00:34:19,440 and for all of the reasons that pascal 1024 00:34:19,440 --> 00:34:21,280 has said the problem is there is going 1025 00:34:21,280 --> 00:34:22,000 to have to be 1026 00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:24,159 these detailed calculations and right 1027 00:34:24,159 --> 00:34:25,760 now the european proposal 1028 00:34:25,760 --> 00:34:27,679 sort of puts those off to sort of 1029 00:34:27,679 --> 00:34:29,599 private companies that would do this 1030 00:34:29,599 --> 00:34:32,239 evaluating of whether or not this is the 1031 00:34:32,239 --> 00:34:33,199 equivalent of that 1032 00:34:33,199 --> 00:34:35,520 in terms of how much the carbon uh you 1033 00:34:35,520 --> 00:34:37,599 know was was burned up in the production 1034 00:34:37,599 --> 00:34:39,679 of a particular ton of product 1035 00:34:39,679 --> 00:34:41,679 uh that is i think gonna lead to a 1036 00:34:41,679 --> 00:34:43,918 cottage industry of of those that are 1037 00:34:43,918 --> 00:34:46,159 doing these kind of evaluations 1038 00:34:46,159 --> 00:34:47,760 and again it gets back to the question 1039 00:34:47,760 --> 00:34:49,440 that christian raised you know at the 1040 00:34:49,440 --> 00:34:49,918 beginning 1041 00:34:49,918 --> 00:34:52,480 is this really worth all of these 1042 00:34:52,480 --> 00:34:53,199 details 1043 00:34:53,199 --> 00:34:56,399 and and again my own sense is um it may 1044 00:34:56,399 --> 00:34:58,640 be necessary as part of the transition 1045 00:34:58,640 --> 00:35:00,560 uh i think what the european union is 1046 00:35:00,560 --> 00:35:02,720 trying to do is to encourage everybody 1047 00:35:02,720 --> 00:35:03,680 to join this 1048 00:35:03,680 --> 00:35:06,000 you know an alternative a completely 1049 00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:07,680 different alternative would be to try to 1050 00:35:07,680 --> 00:35:09,680 create some kind of a carbon customs 1051 00:35:09,680 --> 00:35:10,400 union 1052 00:35:10,400 --> 00:35:12,720 where everybody that is doing anything 1053 00:35:12,720 --> 00:35:14,720 that is the equivalent of carbon pricing 1054 00:35:14,720 --> 00:35:16,640 sort of gets together and says we won't 1055 00:35:16,640 --> 00:35:18,880 charge any of these taxes on each other 1056 00:35:18,880 --> 00:35:20,640 we will only charge them on everybody 1057 00:35:20,640 --> 00:35:22,480 that's outside of the club 1058 00:35:22,480 --> 00:35:24,960 uh that would be an alternative uh that 1059 00:35:24,960 --> 00:35:26,880 would potentially avoid some of this 1060 00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:28,240 litigation 1061 00:35:28,240 --> 00:35:30,480 but again i'm gonna hope that everybody 1062 00:35:30,480 --> 00:35:32,400 is gonna hold off for a while in terms 1063 00:35:32,400 --> 00:35:34,160 of challenging what the european union 1064 00:35:34,160 --> 00:35:35,119 has done 1065 00:35:35,119 --> 00:35:37,440 because of how far they've gone to try 1066 00:35:37,440 --> 00:35:38,640 to make sure that they are 1067 00:35:38,640 --> 00:35:41,200 already wto compatible jennifer does 1068 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:42,880 china have to be in this 1069 00:35:42,880 --> 00:35:46,800 somehow well china has to be in the mix 1070 00:35:46,800 --> 00:35:48,400 uh because if you look at what 1071 00:35:48,400 --> 00:35:50,320 is happening in china just a step back 1072 00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:52,079 from it if you look at who are the 1073 00:35:52,079 --> 00:35:53,359 largest producers of 1074 00:35:53,359 --> 00:35:57,119 solar of of uh of wind of geothermal of 1075 00:35:57,119 --> 00:35:58,160 hydro the 1076 00:35:58,160 --> 00:36:00,160 the biggest best companies in the 1077 00:36:00,160 --> 00:36:01,520 renewable space right now 1078 00:36:01,520 --> 00:36:04,480 are in china uh and yet what have they 1079 00:36:04,480 --> 00:36:06,079 done if you look at again the belt and 1080 00:36:06,079 --> 00:36:07,440 road initiative thank you very much 1081 00:36:07,440 --> 00:36:08,880 steve for commenting on it but if you 1082 00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:10,240 look at what they've done 1083 00:36:10,240 --> 00:36:11,760 in that bell road initiative they've 1084 00:36:11,760 --> 00:36:14,640 exported 260 coal-fired power plants 1085 00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:16,240 uh which are going to be up and running 1086 00:36:16,240 --> 00:36:18,160 for the next 35 years 1087 00:36:18,160 --> 00:36:20,880 largely used buying their coal from 1088 00:36:20,880 --> 00:36:22,000 china 1089 00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:24,240 and again it is making it much much 1090 00:36:24,240 --> 00:36:25,200 harder 1091 00:36:25,200 --> 00:36:27,359 to think about climate change so even if 1092 00:36:27,359 --> 00:36:28,400 china does 1093 00:36:28,400 --> 00:36:31,280 better within the chinese market itself 1094 00:36:31,280 --> 00:36:33,200 we have to take into account what china 1095 00:36:33,200 --> 00:36:33,760 is doing 1096 00:36:33,760 --> 00:36:35,359 externally and what they're doing 1097 00:36:35,359 --> 00:36:37,119 externally is 1098 00:36:37,119 --> 00:36:39,440 going in the absolute opposite direction 1099 00:36:39,440 --> 00:36:41,280 of of fighting climate change so i mean 1100 00:36:41,280 --> 00:36:41,760 a num 1101 00:36:41,760 --> 00:36:43,920 among the other things where i hope the 1102 00:36:43,920 --> 00:36:45,920 u.s and the eu can get together 1103 00:36:45,920 --> 00:36:49,200 is on some serious financing limits 1104 00:36:49,200 --> 00:36:52,400 to basically say no more financing of 1105 00:36:52,400 --> 00:36:54,320 coal-fired power plants whether it's 1106 00:36:54,320 --> 00:36:56,640 belt and road or anybody else we should 1107 00:36:56,640 --> 00:36:57,520 be saying just 1108 00:36:57,520 --> 00:37:00,880 no financing of of coal-fired power 1109 00:37:00,880 --> 00:37:01,599 plants 1110 00:37:01,599 --> 00:37:04,079 period well great well thank you we've 1111 00:37:04,079 --> 00:37:05,760 got questions coming in 1112 00:37:05,760 --> 00:37:07,200 i want to come back in a moment 1113 00:37:07,200 --> 00:37:09,040 christian understand this 350 billion 1114 00:37:09,040 --> 00:37:09,839 euro fund 1115 00:37:09,839 --> 00:37:11,119 i'm always interested where the pots of 1116 00:37:11,119 --> 00:37:12,400 money or we'll have to go back to that 1117 00:37:12,400 --> 00:37:14,320 but let's take your question here 1118 00:37:14,320 --> 00:37:15,680 and if you'll identify yourself and 1119 00:37:15,680 --> 00:37:17,760 we'll just all respond thank you thank 1120 00:37:17,760 --> 00:37:18,079 you 1121 00:37:18,079 --> 00:37:19,760 very much for taking my question my name 1122 00:37:19,760 --> 00:37:21,599 is slavomir hubatka i'm from technical 1123 00:37:21,599 --> 00:37:22,160 university 1124 00:37:22,160 --> 00:37:25,359 of koshita i want to ask about free 1125 00:37:25,359 --> 00:37:27,440 allocations for industry in europe 1126 00:37:27,440 --> 00:37:29,280 either you use steel industry 1127 00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:32,160 as an example you know in europe steel 1128 00:37:32,160 --> 00:37:34,160 industry is one of the biggest emitters 1129 00:37:34,160 --> 00:37:37,040 of co2 emissions and a little closer to 1130 00:37:37,040 --> 00:37:37,599 the mic 1131 00:37:37,599 --> 00:37:40,800 yeah in europe steel industry is one of 1132 00:37:40,800 --> 00:37:42,160 the biggest emitters of 1133 00:37:42,160 --> 00:37:45,040 co2 emissions and most of their cost of 1134 00:37:45,040 --> 00:37:47,920 emissions is covered by three locations 1135 00:37:47,920 --> 00:37:50,720 is there a plan for a transitional phase 1136 00:37:50,720 --> 00:37:52,320 in which the free allocations are 1137 00:37:52,320 --> 00:37:54,400 reduced to zero for example until the 1138 00:37:54,400 --> 00:37:54,960 year to 1139 00:37:54,960 --> 00:37:58,320 2030 or is this is 1140 00:37:58,320 --> 00:38:00,560 it's not there will be no transitional 1141 00:38:00,560 --> 00:38:02,160 phase or the allocation will drop to 1142 00:38:02,160 --> 00:38:04,079 zero suddenly from year to year right 1143 00:38:04,079 --> 00:38:05,520 and is there a possibility it will 1144 00:38:05,520 --> 00:38:06,240 create 1145 00:38:06,240 --> 00:38:09,920 uh industrial climate immigration 1146 00:38:09,920 --> 00:38:12,560 for example u.s lakoshitsa taking back 1147 00:38:12,560 --> 00:38:13,440 its 1148 00:38:13,440 --> 00:38:15,520 production back to back to america or 1149 00:38:15,520 --> 00:38:17,359 for example arthelomata are moving their 1150 00:38:17,359 --> 00:38:19,280 production into china right thank you 1151 00:38:19,280 --> 00:38:20,720 great christian do you want to address 1152 00:38:20,720 --> 00:38:22,400 it for a moment yeah i mean i probably 1153 00:38:22,400 --> 00:38:24,079 have a similar answer than uh 1154 00:38:24,079 --> 00:38:26,000 pascal you know we're having this big 1155 00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:28,720 package about ets review and all of 1156 00:38:28,720 --> 00:38:29,680 these points 1157 00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:32,480 will be reviewed at some uh you know at 1158 00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:33,520 some stage 1159 00:38:33,520 --> 00:38:35,599 or later certainly we'll have to think 1160 00:38:35,599 --> 00:38:37,440 about what we are going to do with these 1161 00:38:37,440 --> 00:38:38,079 200 1162 00:38:38,079 --> 00:38:40,720 350 billion free allocation which is a 1163 00:38:40,720 --> 00:38:42,720 big part of money to drive 1164 00:38:42,720 --> 00:38:45,760 exactly this uh decarbonization in in 1165 00:38:45,760 --> 00:38:47,359 the future and avoiding what you're 1166 00:38:47,359 --> 00:38:49,119 you've been mentioning but i would like 1167 00:38:49,119 --> 00:38:50,560 to pick up the the point 1168 00:38:50,560 --> 00:38:52,640 jennifer if i understood you uh 1169 00:38:52,640 --> 00:38:54,480 correctly you you see 1170 00:38:54,480 --> 00:38:56,560 you know i tend to agree with you that 1171 00:38:56,560 --> 00:38:59,119 the carbon border chestnut mechanism at 1172 00:38:59,119 --> 00:39:00,000 some stage we will 1173 00:39:00,000 --> 00:39:03,200 need you know five to seven years and 1174 00:39:03,200 --> 00:39:05,839 the question to maybe both of you you 1175 00:39:05,839 --> 00:39:07,920 know is wouldn't it be better now to use 1176 00:39:07,920 --> 00:39:08,640 this 1177 00:39:08,640 --> 00:39:10,960 very sophisticated proposal by the by 1178 00:39:10,960 --> 00:39:12,800 the commission i think everybody agrees 1179 00:39:12,800 --> 00:39:14,000 as a sleeping gun 1180 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:16,400 to say look it's there we are trying to 1181 00:39:16,400 --> 00:39:18,560 be pr you have it now ready we will be 1182 00:39:18,560 --> 00:39:19,200 using it 1183 00:39:19,200 --> 00:39:22,480 unless you know yeah yeah 1184 00:39:22,480 --> 00:39:24,000 put the pressure and i think that was 1185 00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:25,920 the initial idea in 1186 00:39:25,920 --> 00:39:28,560 the eu legislation to put the pressure 1187 00:39:28,560 --> 00:39:29,359 as thick 1188 00:39:29,359 --> 00:39:31,680 to get let me ask jennifer to quickly 1189 00:39:31,680 --> 00:39:33,040 respond in them and ask christian to 1190 00:39:33,040 --> 00:39:34,000 respond to our our 1191 00:39:34,000 --> 00:39:35,040 questioner jennifer do you want to 1192 00:39:35,040 --> 00:39:37,440 respond to uh to uh 1193 00:39:37,440 --> 00:39:40,000 well again the question raises again one 1194 00:39:40,000 --> 00:39:41,920 one of those devil in the details is 1195 00:39:41,920 --> 00:39:43,599 this exact issue because 1196 00:39:43,599 --> 00:39:45,520 as the the way in which the european 1197 00:39:45,520 --> 00:39:47,520 union is putting out this proposal 1198 00:39:47,520 --> 00:39:49,680 again u.s steel companies or others that 1199 00:39:49,680 --> 00:39:50,800 are exporting to 1200 00:39:50,800 --> 00:39:53,760 to the eu are going to pay this average 1201 00:39:53,760 --> 00:39:54,400 price 1202 00:39:54,400 --> 00:39:56,320 average across all industries all 1203 00:39:56,320 --> 00:39:58,160 sectors average price 1204 00:39:58,160 --> 00:40:01,280 for their carbon for their their own ets 1205 00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:03,119 certificates in order to be importing so 1206 00:40:03,119 --> 00:40:04,000 they're gonna 1207 00:40:04,000 --> 00:40:06,319 you know calculate an average price uh 1208 00:40:06,319 --> 00:40:08,079 and then that price applies to next 1209 00:40:08,079 --> 00:40:10,000 week's imports if you will um 1210 00:40:10,000 --> 00:40:12,400 and and the and the issue then becomes 1211 00:40:12,400 --> 00:40:13,280 if there are 1212 00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:15,599 a lot of free allocations in one sector 1213 00:40:15,599 --> 00:40:16,319 but not in 1214 00:40:16,319 --> 00:40:18,720 others whether again that that creates 1215 00:40:18,720 --> 00:40:20,319 some unfairnesses 1216 00:40:20,319 --> 00:40:22,960 um and and you know the issue is whether 1217 00:40:22,960 --> 00:40:24,880 or not the free allocations are 1218 00:40:24,880 --> 00:40:27,599 in any way creating disincentives for 1219 00:40:27,599 --> 00:40:29,520 the us for i'm sorry for the european 1220 00:40:29,520 --> 00:40:30,720 steel industry 1221 00:40:30,720 --> 00:40:33,440 which as pascal has said is way ahead of 1222 00:40:33,440 --> 00:40:34,480 the rest of the world 1223 00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:37,119 in coming up with green steel and again 1224 00:40:37,119 --> 00:40:38,720 i think what everybody is in 1225 00:40:38,720 --> 00:40:41,280 everybody's interest is in encouraging 1226 00:40:41,280 --> 00:40:42,480 europe to keep doing that 1227 00:40:42,480 --> 00:40:44,960 please help the world develop green 1228 00:40:44,960 --> 00:40:46,319 steel technology 1229 00:40:46,319 --> 00:40:48,000 uh that's where we need to make sure 1230 00:40:48,000 --> 00:40:49,760 that we have the incentives and and the 1231 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:50,640 question comes 1232 00:40:50,640 --> 00:40:52,480 whether the free allocations help or 1233 00:40:52,480 --> 00:40:54,640 hurt um in that process 1234 00:40:54,640 --> 00:40:57,760 of of encouraging uh the production of 1235 00:40:57,760 --> 00:41:00,640 of green steel within within europe uh 1236 00:41:00,640 --> 00:41:02,319 and whether or not the free allocations 1237 00:41:02,319 --> 00:41:02,720 again 1238 00:41:02,720 --> 00:41:05,280 create a sense of unfairness from u.s 1239 00:41:05,280 --> 00:41:06,560 producers that will say well 1240 00:41:06,560 --> 00:41:08,640 i didn't get a free allocation um and 1241 00:41:08,640 --> 00:41:10,480 therefore the fact that i have to pay 1242 00:41:10,480 --> 00:41:12,800 on my export going into europe creates 1243 00:41:12,800 --> 00:41:14,640 an unfairness 1244 00:41:14,640 --> 00:41:16,000 and thank you for that pascal would you 1245 00:41:16,000 --> 00:41:17,520 like to to quickly respond to our 1246 00:41:17,520 --> 00:41:19,680 questioner 1247 00:41:19,680 --> 00:41:22,720 yeah i mean let's not forget that if the 1248 00:41:22,720 --> 00:41:24,560 starting point 1249 00:41:24,560 --> 00:41:27,760 would be that uh all the key players the 1250 00:41:27,760 --> 00:41:29,280 economic players 1251 00:41:29,280 --> 00:41:32,880 would play the same game on carbonic 1252 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:35,920 climate action we wouldn't don't be 1253 00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:39,520 in here discussing uh carbon border 1254 00:41:39,520 --> 00:41:41,760 adjustment mechanism okay so 1255 00:41:41,760 --> 00:41:44,720 let's let's not accuse the eu of doing 1256 00:41:44,720 --> 00:41:46,000 something that is just 1257 00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:48,160 trying to counter balance the fact that 1258 00:41:48,160 --> 00:41:49,040 others 1259 00:41:49,040 --> 00:41:50,960 are not doing their job i mean we just 1260 00:41:50,960 --> 00:41:52,160 try to be fair to 1261 00:41:52,160 --> 00:41:54,400 all the others but we have also to be 1262 00:41:54,400 --> 00:41:55,440 fair to ourselves 1263 00:41:55,440 --> 00:41:58,880 okay so uh again it's it's a bit uh 1264 00:41:58,880 --> 00:42:01,119 too easy to say well that the machinery 1265 00:42:01,119 --> 00:42:03,119 invented by the eu brain blah blah blah 1266 00:42:03,119 --> 00:42:05,040 blah now we just try to move forward on 1267 00:42:05,040 --> 00:42:06,800 climate and please do so 1268 00:42:06,800 --> 00:42:09,280 as we do so that we can as christians 1269 00:42:09,280 --> 00:42:10,480 said avoid 1270 00:42:10,480 --> 00:42:12,400 avoid having a carbon border adjustment 1271 00:42:12,400 --> 00:42:14,400 mechanism it's not our best plan 1272 00:42:14,400 --> 00:42:17,440 it's just a mechanism we need to uh have 1273 00:42:17,440 --> 00:42:17,839 it 1274 00:42:17,839 --> 00:42:20,400 fair and equitable and then regarding 1275 00:42:20,400 --> 00:42:22,079 the question because it's very important 1276 00:42:22,079 --> 00:42:23,119 one 1277 00:42:23,119 --> 00:42:25,520 i mean the to my view and then that's my 1278 00:42:25,520 --> 00:42:26,960 personal view here 1279 00:42:26,960 --> 00:42:30,160 uh the best way to proceed 1280 00:42:30,160 --> 00:42:33,599 would be to connect the amount of 1281 00:42:33,599 --> 00:42:36,880 free allocations to the ex 1282 00:42:36,880 --> 00:42:41,760 the the effective green investment 1283 00:42:42,240 --> 00:42:45,359 made by a company x so let's somebody 1284 00:42:45,359 --> 00:42:46,800 mentioned arcelormittal 1285 00:42:46,800 --> 00:42:48,960 i think it was in the question if 1286 00:42:48,960 --> 00:42:50,480 arcelormittal 1287 00:42:50,480 --> 00:42:53,440 invest in green steel i don't know let's 1288 00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:53,760 say 1289 00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:56,480 one billion euros or one billion dollars 1290 00:42:56,480 --> 00:42:56,880 then 1291 00:42:56,880 --> 00:42:59,839 you have free allocation to compensate 1292 00:42:59,839 --> 00:43:01,200 because of course 1293 00:43:01,200 --> 00:43:04,319 of course if you have to pay i take the 1294 00:43:04,319 --> 00:43:06,880 the theoretical example of arcelormittal 1295 00:43:06,880 --> 00:43:07,680 in europe 1296 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:10,640 if you have to pay your allocation 1297 00:43:10,640 --> 00:43:12,160 because it's not free anymore 1298 00:43:12,160 --> 00:43:15,040 so you have to pay 50 euros per ton of 1299 00:43:15,040 --> 00:43:16,640 co2 you aim it 1300 00:43:16,640 --> 00:43:18,640 plus you have to pay the green 1301 00:43:18,640 --> 00:43:20,079 investments to invent 1302 00:43:20,079 --> 00:43:23,119 green steam then you pay twice and then 1303 00:43:23,119 --> 00:43:25,440 it's unfair actually you won't do it 1304 00:43:25,440 --> 00:43:27,359 so that's why we need to make sure that 1305 00:43:27,359 --> 00:43:28,800 if you invest 1306 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:31,119 for real in a new industrial process 1307 00:43:31,119 --> 00:43:32,560 decarbonized 1308 00:43:32,560 --> 00:43:35,520 then you keep the free allocation if you 1309 00:43:35,520 --> 00:43:36,480 do not 1310 00:43:36,480 --> 00:43:39,119 then you pay the carbon price that's to 1311 00:43:39,119 --> 00:43:40,240 my view the right 1312 00:43:40,240 --> 00:43:42,800 balance uh to strike and that's will be 1313 00:43:42,800 --> 00:43:43,520 for the 1314 00:43:43,520 --> 00:43:46,800 uh reform of the carbon market uh 1315 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:49,200 uh which will be presented in a month's 1316 00:43:49,200 --> 00:43:50,880 time by the european commission 1317 00:43:50,880 --> 00:43:53,040 terrific we have a minute and 42 seconds 1318 00:43:53,040 --> 00:43:54,800 but we've got a very good question from 1319 00:43:54,800 --> 00:43:55,920 jason poon 1320 00:43:55,920 --> 00:43:58,079 uh on the app desk how can you assess 1321 00:43:58,079 --> 00:44:00,160 the carbon emission of products 1322 00:44:00,160 --> 00:44:01,599 involving many countries in their 1323 00:44:01,599 --> 00:44:03,920 production chain will it uh imply 1324 00:44:03,920 --> 00:44:05,520 massive administrative costs 1325 00:44:05,520 --> 00:44:08,000 so i i i love this question because that 1326 00:44:08,000 --> 00:44:09,520 is a really we've been talking about 1327 00:44:09,520 --> 00:44:10,079 steel 1328 00:44:10,079 --> 00:44:12,240 and big commodities but this is actually 1329 00:44:12,240 --> 00:44:13,760 talking about the complexity 1330 00:44:13,760 --> 00:44:15,599 of our world today that is in all the 1331 00:44:15,599 --> 00:44:17,040 widgets we carry around 1332 00:44:17,040 --> 00:44:19,200 so um let's let's just have quick slices 1333 00:44:19,200 --> 00:44:20,319 of this snapshots 1334 00:44:20,319 --> 00:44:22,000 uh we'll start with uh christian would 1335 00:44:22,000 --> 00:44:23,599 you would you your thoughts yeah 1336 00:44:23,599 --> 00:44:26,079 we are starting with basic materials ah 1337 00:44:26,079 --> 00:44:27,119 it's steel 1338 00:44:27,119 --> 00:44:29,200 aluminum and so on we are not talking 1339 00:44:29,200 --> 00:44:31,040 about cars where you have a lot of 1340 00:44:31,040 --> 00:44:34,240 embedded so that's doable uh i say this 1341 00:44:34,240 --> 00:44:36,240 just after we have had the airplane deal 1342 00:44:36,240 --> 00:44:36,960 right on 1343 00:44:36,960 --> 00:44:39,359 boeing airbus and the complexity of who 1344 00:44:39,359 --> 00:44:40,480 makes what where 1345 00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:42,319 that's probably gonna that's probably 1346 00:44:42,319 --> 00:44:45,359 easier than that deal huh huh 1347 00:44:45,359 --> 00:44:48,880 jennifer will know okay great jennifer 1348 00:44:48,880 --> 00:44:50,000 hillman your thoughts 1349 00:44:50,000 --> 00:44:51,760 again i i think the answer to the 1350 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:53,920 question is if you were trying to apply 1351 00:44:53,920 --> 00:44:56,079 this carbon text to very downstream 1352 00:44:56,079 --> 00:44:57,599 products to cars 1353 00:44:57,599 --> 00:44:59,599 or par or products that had components 1354 00:44:59,599 --> 00:45:01,200 from all over the answer is yes it would 1355 00:45:01,200 --> 00:45:03,119 be very very complicated and i think 1356 00:45:03,119 --> 00:45:05,280 that's why again the eu has been smart 1357 00:45:05,280 --> 00:45:07,280 uh they're starting with just sort of 1358 00:45:07,280 --> 00:45:08,880 basic commodities that tend to be 1359 00:45:08,880 --> 00:45:09,359 produced 1360 00:45:09,359 --> 00:45:11,520 in a single facility or by a single 1361 00:45:11,520 --> 00:45:12,640 company 1362 00:45:12,640 --> 00:45:15,280 and those companies definitely can make 1363 00:45:15,280 --> 00:45:16,880 these calculations i mean 1364 00:45:16,880 --> 00:45:18,480 in the united states this kind of data 1365 00:45:18,480 --> 00:45:20,240 has been collected for decades 1366 00:45:20,240 --> 00:45:22,720 under our various clean air provisions 1367 00:45:22,720 --> 00:45:23,440 and so 1368 00:45:23,440 --> 00:45:25,760 if you're limiting it to you know again 1369 00:45:25,760 --> 00:45:26,880 basic steel products 1370 00:45:26,880 --> 00:45:28,800 aluminum products cement products 1371 00:45:28,800 --> 00:45:29,920 fertilizer products 1372 00:45:29,920 --> 00:45:32,400 the answer is yes you can easily and i 1373 00:45:32,400 --> 00:45:34,560 think fairly readily determine 1374 00:45:34,560 --> 00:45:37,839 how much uh ghg gases were emitted in 1375 00:45:37,839 --> 00:45:40,640 the production of that particular ton of 1376 00:45:40,640 --> 00:45:43,680 steel cement you know glass if you start 1377 00:45:43,680 --> 00:45:45,680 to go much further downstream 1378 00:45:45,680 --> 00:45:48,560 it does get to be much harder uh i'll 1379 00:45:48,560 --> 00:45:49,680 say this i'm gonna give uh 1380 00:45:49,680 --> 00:45:51,520 our mr chairman pascal confident the 1381 00:45:51,520 --> 00:45:52,720 last uh word 1382 00:45:52,720 --> 00:45:54,480 but in in doing so referring back to 1383 00:45:54,480 --> 00:45:55,839 this conversation 1384 00:45:55,839 --> 00:45:57,440 that the french ambassador hosted on 1385 00:45:57,440 --> 00:45:59,119 this topic with pascal amy 1386 00:45:59,119 --> 00:46:01,040 and senator sheldon whitehouse i'll tell 1387 00:46:01,040 --> 00:46:02,800 you that senator sheldon whitehouse am i 1388 00:46:02,800 --> 00:46:04,800 invited to possibly join today but he 1389 00:46:04,800 --> 00:46:05,920 couldn't make it 1390 00:46:05,920 --> 00:46:09,119 said he he actually applauded uh this 1391 00:46:09,119 --> 00:46:09,839 mechanism 1392 00:46:09,839 --> 00:46:12,640 thought it was great and lamented that 1393 00:46:12,640 --> 00:46:14,079 the u.s government 1394 00:46:14,079 --> 00:46:16,079 wasn't as aligned with europe on these 1395 00:46:16,079 --> 00:46:18,160 issues with so pascal that is a point in 1396 00:46:18,160 --> 00:46:19,040 your corner 1397 00:46:19,040 --> 00:46:20,880 from one of our politicians so last word 1398 00:46:20,880 --> 00:46:23,359 pascal 1399 00:46:23,599 --> 00:46:25,680 well uh you know a carbon border 1400 00:46:25,680 --> 00:46:26,800 adjustment mechanism 1401 00:46:26,800 --> 00:46:30,880 is in the biden platform but to china 1402 00:46:30,880 --> 00:46:32,800 so that's interesting because actually 1403 00:46:32,800 --> 00:46:34,240 the u.s 1404 00:46:34,240 --> 00:46:37,680 the u.s administration will be somewhere 1405 00:46:37,680 --> 00:46:39,599 in the middle that's why kerry when he 1406 00:46:39,599 --> 00:46:40,960 came to europe 1407 00:46:40,960 --> 00:46:44,160 said i'm not against i have questions 1408 00:46:44,160 --> 00:46:46,319 which i think is the right way to have a 1409 00:46:46,319 --> 00:46:47,920 good relationship between the you and 1410 00:46:47,920 --> 00:46:48,480 the u.s 1411 00:46:48,480 --> 00:46:50,880 you challenge us we challenge you within 1412 00:46:50,880 --> 00:46:52,880 a but in a cooperative 1413 00:46:52,880 --> 00:46:55,040 and a positive mindset because at the 1414 00:46:55,040 --> 00:46:56,079 end of the day 1415 00:46:56,079 --> 00:46:59,280 what we want is the exact same goal 1416 00:46:59,280 --> 00:47:01,280 well with that i'm going to close this 1417 00:47:01,280 --> 00:47:03,040 session i want to thank pascal confed 1418 00:47:03,040 --> 00:47:03,599 chair 1419 00:47:03,599 --> 00:47:05,200 of the committee on environment public 1420 00:47:05,200 --> 00:47:07,119 health and food safety at the european 1421 00:47:07,119 --> 00:47:07,760 parliament 1422 00:47:07,760 --> 00:47:09,520 jennifer hillman who's had every cool 1423 00:47:09,520 --> 00:47:11,760 job in trade in washington d.c and 1424 00:47:11,760 --> 00:47:12,800 probably 1425 00:47:12,800 --> 00:47:15,040 geneva with the council on foreign 1426 00:47:15,040 --> 00:47:16,640 relations senior fellow for trade and 1427 00:47:16,640 --> 00:47:17,359 international 1428 00:47:17,359 --> 00:47:19,200 political economy there and again check 1429 00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:21,599 out her report on china's belt and road 1430 00:47:21,599 --> 00:47:23,839 quite interesting and here with me uh in 1431 00:47:23,839 --> 00:47:25,839 the room christian engenhofer 1432 00:47:25,839 --> 00:47:27,920 of both the european university 1433 00:47:27,920 --> 00:47:29,119 institute in florence 1434 00:47:29,119 --> 00:47:31,119 and the anceps in brussels thank you all 1435 00:47:31,119 --> 00:47:33,200 very much big and thank you to those who 1436 00:47:33,200 --> 00:47:34,559 ask questions a big round of applause 1437 00:47:34,559 --> 00:47:38,319 for our panel and 1438 00:47:38,319 --> 00:47:39,760 in five minutes we're going to continue 1439 00:47:39,760 --> 00:47:41,920 with vasilov havel transatlantic 1440 00:47:41,920 --> 00:47:43,599 dialogues the russia challenge 1441 00:47:43,599 --> 00:47:45,599 where to now and i see some people have 1442 00:47:45,599 --> 00:47:49,040 arrived for that so thank you all very 1443 00:47:50,839 --> 00:47:53,839 much 1444 00:47:54,450 --> 00:47:56,319 [Music] 1445 00:47:56,319 --> 00:47:58,400 you